[CTC] NAFTA talks appear to sour after report Trump disparaged Canada

[Arthur Stamoulis]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/nafta-talks-appear-to-sour-after-report-that-trump-disparaged-canada/2018/08/31/56ba2868-ad30-11e8-8a0c-70b618c98d3c_story.html?utm_term=.0ca83312a8a8

NAFTA talks appear to sour after report Trump disparaged Canada

By Damian Paletta <https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/damian-paletta> and
Jeff Stein <https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/jeff-stein/>August 31 at 1:14 PM

High-stakes trade negotiations between the White House and Canadian leaders showed signs of faltering on Friday, as Canadian officials expressed frustration with U.S. demands and a report surfaced that President Trump had privately disparaged Canada and upset the already delicate talks.

It couldn’t immediately be learned whether the setbacks would prove temporary or could threaten Trump’s ultimate goal of reworking the North American Free Trade Agreement, a core promise of his 2016 presidential campaign.

Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland met with U.S. Trade Representative Robert E. Lighthizer on Friday morning, and in comments to reporters outside the meeting, she took a more subdued tone. In past days, she has repeatedly said she was “optimistic,” but she didn’t use that word on Friday.

“We’re not there yet,” she told reporters during a break from meetings. She said they would meet again later in the day.

When asked if the U.S. was negotiating in “good faith,” Freeland paused for a moment before saying Lighthizer was “working really, really hard.” She did not mention Trump by name.

Minutes earlier, the Toronto Star published what it alleged were off-the-record comments made by Trump on Thursday to Bloomberg. The Star reported Trump told Bloomberg journalists the Nafta talks would only be done on his terms, suggesting he would not offer any concessions to Canada.

Freeland said Canadians would not be pushed into a deal that’s not in their interest, suggesting the White House needed to soften some of its demands.

“At the end of the day, we are only going to sign a deal that’s good for Canada,” she said.

White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters declined to comment on the Star report, but she said talks between both countries remained active.

“The Canadian and American negotiators continue to work on reaching a win-win deal that benefits both countries,” she said.

Canadian officials had previously expressed frustration that they believed the White House wasn’t willing to budge on a range of demands, from dairy policy to dispute resolution, and the Star report may have validated their fears. The Washington Post couldn’t immediately verify Trump’s comments, as reported by the Star.

Freeland didn’t address Trump’s alleged comments in her brief meeting with reporters, though she did say that there had “been moments of drama throughout” the talks.

The White House has set its own deadline of Friday for the completion of negotiations on a preliminary deal with Canada, part of Trump’s goal to get a new pact signed before Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto leaves office December 1.

Trump has said he will forge ahead without Canada if necessary and complete a new trade agreement with Mexico, a preliminary version of which Trump announced on Monday. But GOP lawmakers in Congress have said they would oppose any changes unless Canada was involved.

Canada could be added later into preliminary U.S.-Mexico deal, but that would involve legal complications and add fresh scrutiny from Congress.

Completing the process of reworking Nafta, could ulimately take months or even years, as a vote from Congress would only follow a lengthy review process and potentially contentious debate. Some GOP lawmakers expressed hope Friday that all parties would ultimately cut a deal, despite lingering differences.

“I hope they make the deadline, and I think they’re hard at work at it,” Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said. Of the longstanding tension between the U.S. and Canada, Roberts remarked, “Well, I think maybe that situation got off on the wrong foot.”

Trump has tried for months to pressure Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau into a series of trade concessions, imposing tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum imports and vowing to enact similar penalties on automobiles and auto parts. Trump has badmouthed and even mocked Trudeau in public and private a number of times this year.

Trump has called Trudeau “meek” and “mild.” Trudeau has responded to Trump by saying “we will not be pushed around.”

Despite the bad blood, the U.S. and Canada have interwoven economies, with integrated supply chains and vast amounts of trade. Goods and services sold between the two countries last year reached $673.1 billion, making Canada the United States’ largest export market for goods.

Canada has responded angrily to Trump’s adversarial trade approach this year. Trudeau and his team imposed their own tariffs on U.S. goods as a way to try and counter the steel and aluminum tariffs Trump imposed on Canada, fueling concerns of a trade war.

Trump has long believed that Nafta, enacted in 1994, decimated the U.S. manufacturing base by incentivizing companies to move jobs to lower-wage Mexico. But many business groups have said Nafta actually helped grow the U.S., Mexican, and Canadian economies more broadly, even if it did lead to job losses in certain sectors as factories moved from one country to another.

Last year, Trump threatened to withdraw from Nafta completely unless Mexico and Canada made major concessions, but he was talked out of it by business leaders and some of his closest advisers, including Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue.

During the 2016 campaign, Trump focused much of his ire at Mexico, but he has spent much of the past year leveling attacks at Canada for what he has alleged is unfair government support for their dairy industry, among other things.

Three-nation negotiations moved slowly and then seemed to hit a wall in June after Trump left the Group of Seven nations meeting early and unloaded a series of attacks at Trudeau.

This prompted White House officials to concentrate their negotiations with Mexico, a strategy that appeared to work as both countries announced they had resolved most of their disagreements on Aug. 27.

That gave Canada just a few days to reengage in order to meet the White House’s Friday deadline. Freeland rushed back from Europe and spent several days meeting with Lighthizer.

She had expressed optimism several times about the way things were progressing, but they had delayed any decisions on the thorniest issues, including dairy policy and how to resolve disputes, until the final stage.

They met several times Thursday, but their final meeting at 10:15 pm lasted just five minutes, someone briefed on the schedule said. It’s unclear where things stood after that point.

Each time talks with Canada have faltered, Trump has responded with personal attacks aimed at Trudeau and threatened to rip up the existing economic relationship between the two countries. But Canadians have expressed less shock each time he’s done this, becoming more familiar with his negotiating tactics.

Trudeau, meanwhile, faces difficult decisions of his own. If he decides to pull back from negotiations until the U.S. offers significant concessions, he could risk putting his country in a spiraling brawl with the White House and the unpredictable U.S. president. Even if a number of GOP lawmakers have vowed to preserve Canada’s status in the trade deal, Trump has not shown any sign of bending to congressional will.

- Selena Ross in Montreal and Erica Werner in Washington contributed to this report.


Arthur Stamoulis
Citizens Trade Campaign
(202) 494-8826




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20180831/f6dc6ac2/attachment.html>