<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><section class="ccb ccb-chapter" data-chapter-title="Endnotes" data-chapter="6" id="chapter-6" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><div class="footnotes" id="footnotes-465744" style="box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.3;"><ol style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.65em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 2rem; font-size: 1.1rem !important; line-height: 2rem !important;"><li id="fn-465744-56" class="selectionShareable _mPS2id-t" style="box-sizing: inherit; margin-bottom: 1rem !important; line-height: 2; word-wrap: break-word;"><span class="footnotereverse" style="box-sizing: inherit;"><a href="https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2019/02/01/465744/trumps-trade-deal-road-not-taken/#fnref-465744-56" in_tag="ol" kaspersky_status="skipped" class="_mPS2id-h" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration: none; transition: color 150ms ease; -webkit-transition: color 150ms ease; color: rgb(35, 94, 189);"></a></span></li><li id="fn-465744-57" class="selectionShareable _mPS2id-t" style="box-sizing: inherit; margin-bottom: 1rem !important; line-height: 2; word-wrap: break-word;">Sierra Club, “Discussion Paper: A New Climate-Friendly Approach to Trade” (2016), available at <a href="https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/www.sierraclub.org/files/uploads-wysiwig/climate-friendly-trade-model.pdf" in_tag="ol" kaspersky_status="skipped" checked_link="https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/www.sierraclub.org/files/uploads-wysiwig/climate-friendly-trade-model.pdf" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration: none; transition: color 150ms ease; -webkit-transition: color 150ms ease; color: rgb(35, 94, 189);" class="">https://www.sierraclub.org/sites/www.sierraclub.org/files/uploads-wysiwig/climate-friendly-trade-model.pdf</a>. The authors highlight the need to prevent trade agreements from frustrating actions to address climate and environmental harms because of the very large economic externalities involved. National measures that require business to more fully internalize the costs of these harms will lead corporations to take evasive measures, so trade agreements need to be structured to discourage this. This is not to say that trade agreements should be allowed to weaken other important public interest rules, as is highlighted in greater detail below, under “What should be excluded or reformed.” For an insightful examination of how seemingly neutral investment protections tilt power against public interest domestic decision-making and otherwise can be expanded through legal challenges, see Todd N. Tucker, <em style="box-sizing: inherit;" class="">Judge Knot: Politics and Development in International Investment Law</em> (New York: Anthem Press, 2018). <span class="footnotereverse" style="box-sizing: inherit;"><a href="https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2019/02/01/465744/trumps-trade-deal-road-not-taken/#fnref-465744-57" in_tag="ol" kaspersky_status="skipped" class="_mPS2id-h" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration: none; transition: color 150ms ease; -webkit-transition: color 150ms ease; color: rgb(35, 94, 189);"></a></span></li></ol></div></section></body></html>