[CTC_TRADE] Reps. Ryan and Michaud -- China Currency Letter
Citizens Trade Campaign
ctc_pac at charter.net
Tue Mar 16 07:34:11 PDT 2010
LABOR DECLARATION ON THE NEGOTIATION OF
THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP TRADE AGREEMENT
March 15, 2010
On March 15, 2010, the governments of Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Chile,
New
Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States of America and Vietnam will
commence
negotiations for a proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement
(TPPTA). The
undersigned unions are not opposed in principle to trade agreements. As
always,
however, the agreement will not have our support unless it is well balanced,
foments the
creation of good jobs, protects the rights and interests of working people,
leads to longterm,
balanced economic development and promotes a healthy environment. We set out
below what that means in practice. Throughout the negotiations, we urge
negotiators to
adopt a jobs lens, which asks how decisions at the negotiating table
contribute to a
coordinated strategy for the promotion of high-quality jobs and sustainable
economic
development among TPPTA member countries. It is time for a new trade
framework that
will make a positive difference in the lives of working people. We cannot
afford another
trade agreement that privileges substantial new opportunities for investors
over good jobs
for workers. Further, to work well, trade agreements must also be fairly and
consistently
enforced.
This declaration outlines the substantive and procedural principles for the
negotiations,
which if respected, will result in an agreement that may benefit us all.
PROCESS
1. A Single, High-Standard, Fair Trade Agreement
For many, the TPPTA represents the second or third potential trade agreement
with
another party to the negotiations - all of which failed to meet our
aspirations. We believe
that the only way to truly bring trade policy into the 21st century is for
the TPPTA to
supersede the existing agreements to the maximum extent possible, bringing
them up to
the highest standards. Of course, we realize that individual countries,
especially
developing countries, may pose unique challenges that may call for some
variation in the
text from country to country. However, we believe the core principles should
be
common to all.
2. Transparency and Civil Society Participation:
In the past, civil society organizations have been excluded from any
meaningful
participation in trade agreement negotiations. This is unacceptable and must
be remedied
this time around. All the participating governments must conduct regular and
meaningful
consultations with their respective civil societies throughout the
negotiations - both
during and between negotiating rounds. Further, draft texts, proposals and
requests
should be made available for public review and comment. Without access to
such
information, informed participation in the negotiating process is
impossible. Finally, the
2
respective legislatures must have an opportunity to conduct full and open
hearings and to
amend the agreement.
SUBSTANCE
1. Worker Rights
Labor rights are an essential component of trade. Workers who are able to
exercise their
fundamental labor rights are empowered to bargain collectively for better
wages and
working conditions, ensuring that the benefits of trade accrue not only to
capital but also
to labor. Unfortunately, most of the agreements among the proposed TPPTA
parties
contain either no labor provisions or very weak ones. The TPPTA must at a
minimum
require that each party adopt and maintain laws and regulations consistent
with the
International Labor Organization (ILO) core labor rights and effectively
enforce those
rights, as well as all domestic laws with regard to wages, hours of work and
safety and
health. Further, parties must commit not to derogate from these laws. A
violation of
these and other labor obligations should be subject to effective dispute
resolution
procedures with strong remedies up to and including trade sanctions should
more
cooperative efforts fail. The monitoring of these provisions should include
workers' and
employers' representatives, and the agencies responsible for enforcement
must be
adequately resourced.
Further, as labor laws of each of the potential TPPTA parties fall short, to
varying
degrees, of the core labor rights, we urge governments to initiate
immediately a process,
together with workers and employers representatives, to identify ways in
which to bring
labor laws into compliance with those international minimum standards. Those
efforts
should be concluded in tandem with completion of any TPPTA.
2. Investment
Most current trade agreements contain investment provisions that allow
foreign investors
to claim substantive and procedural rights above and beyond those that
domestic
investors enjoy. Further, flawed investor-to-state dispute resolution
mechanisms contain
none of the controls, such as an exhaustion of remedies requirement or a
standing
appellate mechanism that could limit abuse of this private right of action.
Under certain
existing investment chapters, investors have used the rules on
expropriations and the
minimum standard of treatment to challenge environmental laws and public
health and
safety protections, among others. Together, these and other investment
provisions may
provide foreign investors greater rights than the rights available to
domestic investors in
their own legal systems. The TPPTA should not include an investor-to-state
dispute
resolution mechanism, nor should the rules allow for challenges to
legitimate public
interest regulations. Foreign investors simply must not be given any greater
rights than
those enjoyed by domestic investors.
3
3. Services
Except for the very limited situation in which no private providers compete
with a
government provided service, any public service can be subject to the rules
of a trade
agreement. This allows parties to challenge domestic policies that protect
governmental
services if they believe these policies put private providers at a
competitive disadvantage
- even where government involvement is necessary to guarantee access to
essential
services in areas such as health care, education, and utilities. Services
rules also penalize
governments that reverse privatizations, even if such privatizations have
lowered service
quality or have led to less public accountability and access.
The TPPTA must include a broad, explicit carve-out for essential public
services,
including education, employment services, health care, post, sanitation,
social services,
transport and utilities. Public services should be excluded regardless of
whether or not
the public provider competes with private providers. In addition,
governments must
retain their ability to regulate foreign service providers in order to enact
and enforce
certification and licensing standards, consumer protections, and other
public interest
laws. We also urge that the negotiations proceed on a positive list
approach.
Further, we are concerned that existing trade agreements contain ambiguous
language
that may constrain the ability of governments to adopt prudential financial
regulations,
including structural separation between commercial and proprietary trading
banking
institutions. We urge negotiators to make absolutely clear that efforts by a
country to
prudentially regulate its financial sector will not run afoul of financial
services rules.
4. Environment
Protection of the environment is a critical trade policy objective. Trade
rules should
require full compliance with an agreed-upon set of multilateral
environmental
agreements, with effective sanctions for non-compliance. At the same time,
the
agreement must ensure that other rules, such as investment rules on
expropriation, do not
jeopardize efforts to enact and enforce environmental laws and regulations.
5. Procurement
Often, governments use procurement policy in furtherance of important public
policy
aims such as local economic development and job creation. Governments have
also
conditioned procurement to promote environmental and social goals.
Governments
should ensure that the procurement chapter does not constrain the ability of
central,
regional or local governments and authorities to carry out these objectives.
6. Intellectual Property and Health
Intellectual property rules and other provisions in trade agreements have
been used to
weaken the ability of governments to supply medicines to their citizens at
an affordable
4
cost. We oppose any government efforts in the context of the TPPTA to
negotiate
language that would reduce access to affordable medicines.
7. Consumer Protection
Our domestic consumer safety and trade policies must be crafted to prevent
tainted or
defective products from reaching our shores and, subsequently, our shelves.
Such goods
present a serious threat to the general public. Thus, the agreement should
include
language that would further facilitate cross-border food and consumer and
industrial
product safety inspections by, for example, giving safety inspectors of a
TPPTA member
enhanced rights to inspect the facilities of another member. The TPPTA
should also
include language requiring country of origin labeling, which would clearly
identify the
origin of food and consumer goods, as well as labeling of GMO-containing
goods.
8. Market Access
In many previous trade agreements, tariff reductions have not resulted in
new access.
We urge negotiators to pay particular attention, and give particular
emphasis, to ensuring
that any market access expected from the agreement is actually achieved.
Effective
market access depends on addressing both tariff and non-tariff measures,
though we
recognize that non-tariff measures to protect health, public safety and the
environment
serve an important purpose if fairly applied. Further, while taking into
account the
complexity of the global supply chain, the rules of origin should be
negotiated such that
the signatories are the primary beneficiaries of any new market access.
9. Trade Remedies
The TPPTA should not in any way weaken trade remedy and safeguard
mechanisms.
10. Competition Policy
We are greatly concerned that the current competition chapter of the P-4
agreement could
compromise the right of governments to provide services on a privileged or
monopoly
basis, and to support economic development. We oppose any move to make the
P-4
language with regard to public services enforceable in the TPPTA and urge
greater
protection for public services and economic development.
11. Temporary Movement of People
We do not believe that a trade agreement is the proper instrument to make
commitments
on the temporary movement of people.
12. Beneficiaries
Negotiators should ensure that countries not party to the agreement cannot
gain its
benefits.
5
The unions that are signatory to this Labor Declaration have a broad range
of interests not
limited to those mentioned above. We reserve the right to raise other issues
jointly or
individually, and expect to be consulted on developments in the negotiations
as they
arise.
Signed,
Sharan Burrow, President
Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU)
Helen Kelly, President
New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU)
John De Payva, President
National Trade Union Congress (NTUC)-Singapore
Richard L. Trumka, President
American Federation of Labor &
Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20100315/181c66f1/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TPP Joint Declaration Final.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 34496 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20100315/181c66f1/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Header.dat
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1201 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20100315/181c66f1/attachment-0001.obj>
More information about the CTCField
mailing list