[CTC] Krugman || Trade and Trust

Fri May 22 07:04:21 PDT 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0

Trade and Trust
MAY 22, 2015
Advertisement

Continue reading the main story <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0#story-continues-1>
 <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/paulkrugman/index.html>
Paul Krugman <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/paulkrugman/index.html>

One of the Obama administration’s underrated virtues is its intellectual honesty. Yes, Republicans see deception and sinister ulterior motives everywhere, but they’re just projecting. The truth is that, in the policy areas I follow, this White House has been remarkably clear and straightforward about what it’s doing and why.

Every area, that is, except one: international trade and investment.

I don’t know why the president has chosen to make the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership such a policy priority. Still, there is an argument to be made for such a deal, and some reasonable, well-intentioned people are supporting the initiative.

Continue reading the main story <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0#story-continues-2>RELATED IN OPINION <http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html>
Editorial: On Trade, Don’t Leave Workers BehindMAY 22, 2015
 <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/on-trade-dont-leave-workers-behind.html>Editorial: On Trade, Don’t Leave Workers BehindMAY 22, 2015
But other reasonable, well-intentioned people have serious questions about what’s going on. And I would have expected a good-faith effort to answer those questions. Unfortunately, that’s not at all what has been happening. Instead, the selling of the 12-nation Pacific Rim pact has the feel of a snow job. Officials have evaded the main concerns about the content of a potential deal; they’ve belittled and dismissed the critics; and they’ve made blithe assurances that turn out not to be true.

The administration’s main analytical defense of the trade deal came earlier this month, in a report from the Council of Economic Advisers <https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/cea_trade_report_final_non-embargoed_v2.pdf>. Strangely, however, the report didn’t actually analyze the Pacific trade pact. Instead, it was a paean to the virtues of free trade, which was irrelevant to the question at hand.

Paul Krugman <http://www.nytimes.com/column/paul-krugman>
Macroeconomics, trade, health care, social policy and politics.
Errors and Lies MAY 18
 <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/18/opinion/paul-krugman-errors-and-lies.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fpaul-krugman>
Fraternity of Failure MAY 15
 <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/15/opinion/paul-krugman-fraternity-of-failure.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fpaul-krugman>
Wall Street Vampires MAY 11
 <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/11/opinion/paul-krugman-wall-street-vampires.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fpaul-krugman>
Triumph of the Unthinking MAY 8
 <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/08/opinion/paul-krugman-triumph-of-the-unthinking.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fpaul-krugman>
Race, Class and Neglect MAY 4
 <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/04/opinion/paul-krugman-race-class-and-neglect.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fpaul-krugman>
See More » <http://www.nytimes.com/column/paul-krugman>
First of all, whatever you may say about the benefits of free trade, most of those benefits have already been realized. A series of past trade agreements, going back almost 70 years, has brought tariffs and other barriers to trade very low to the point where any effect they may have on U.S. trade is swamped by other factors, like changes in currency values <http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/21/tariffs-versus-currencies/>.

In any case, the Pacific trade deal isn’t really about trade. Some already low tariffs would come down, but the main thrust of the proposed deal involves strengthening intellectual property rights — things like drug patents and movie copyrights — and changing the way companies and countries settle disputes. And it’s by no means clear that either of those changes is good for America.

On intellectual property: patents and copyrights are how we reward innovation. But do we need to increase those rewards at consumers’ expense? Big Pharma and Hollywood think so, but you can also see why, for example, Doctors Without Borders is worried <http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/news-stories/briefing-document/trading-away-health-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp> that the deal would make medicines unaffordable in developing countries. That’s a serious concern, and it’s one that the pact’s supporters haven’t addressed in any satisfying way.

On dispute settlement <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/03/26/people-are-freaking-out-about-the-trans-pacific-partnerships-investor-dispute-settlement-system-why-should-you-care/>: a leaked draft chapter shows that the deal would create a system under which multinational corporations could sue governments over alleged violations of the agreement, and have the cases judged by partially privatized tribunals. Critics like Senator Elizabeth Warren warn that this could compromise the independence of U.S. domestic policy — that these tribunals could, for example, be used to attack and undermine financial reform.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0#story-continues-5>Advertisement

Continue reading the main story <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0#story-continues-5>
Advertisement

Continue reading the main story <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0#story-continues-5>
Not so, says the Obama administration, with the president declaring that Senator Warren is “absolutely wrong.” But she isn’t <http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/may/14/elizabeth-warren/fact-checking-elizabeth-warren-and-barack-obama-tr/>. The Pacific trade pact could force the United States to change policies or face big fines, and financial regulation is one policy that might be in the line of fire. As if to illustrate the point, Canada’s finance minister recently declared <http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/volcker-rule-in-bank-reforms-violates-nafta-joe-oliver-argues-1.3072466> that the Volcker Rule, a key provision of the 2010 U.S. financial reform, violates the existing North American Free Trade Agreement. Even if he can’t make that claim stick, his remarks demonstrate that there’s nothing foolish about worrying that trade and investment pacts can threaten bank regulation.

Continue reading the main story <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0#story-continues-6>RECENT COMMENTS

John F. McBride 5 minutes ago
When one considers the high-anxiety expressed in the last several weeks about the lies and deceptions of the Bush administration's sell of...
casual observer 9 minutes ago
I suspect that what is going on is that President Obama has not been able to address trade issues in the Pacific because of many other...
caps florida 20 minutes ago
Once again, we are reaping the fruit of our own destruction. We are supposed to be a Democracy where majority rules. However, our uneducated...
SEE ALL COMMENTS WRITE A COMMENT
As I see it, the big problem here is one of trust.

CONTINUE READING THE MAIN STORY <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/opinion/paul-krugman-trade-and-trust.html?_r=0#story-continues-7>
146
COMMENTS
International economic agreements are, inevitably, complex, and you don’t want to find out at the last minute — just before an up-or-down, all-or-nothing vote — that a lot of bad stuff has been incorporated into the text. So you want reassurance that the people negotiating the deal are listening to valid concerns, that they are serving the national interest rather than the interests of well-connected corporations.

Instead of addressing real concerns, however, the Obama administration has been dismissive, trying to portray skeptics as uninformed hacks who don’t understand the virtues of trade. But they’re not: the skeptics have on balance been more right than wrong about issues like dispute settlement, and the only really hackish economics <http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/the-mis-selling-of-tpp/> I’ve seen in this debate is coming from supporters of the trade pact.

It’s really disappointing and disheartening to see this kind of thing from a White House that has, as I said, been quite forthright on other issues. And the fact that the administration evidently doesn’t feel that it can make an honest case for the Trans-Pacific Partnership suggests that this isn’t a deal we should support.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20150522/c7875b44/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: krugman-circular-thumbLarge-v3.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 13430 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20150522/c7875b44/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 22fri2web-thumbStandard.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2703 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20150522/c7875b44/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: krugman-circular-blogSmallThumb-v2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5978 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.citizenstrade.org/pipermail/ctcfield-citizenstrade.org/attachments/20150522/c7875b44/attachment.png>